Opcode0 | 0x00 | 0 | SPI read cycle without address Platform: Intel Xeon Processor E5/E7 v5 (Skylake) Helper : OSXHelper (/Users/x299/Downloads/chipsec/chipsec/helper/osx/chipsec.kext) API mode: using CHIPSEC kernel module API # CHIPSEC: Platform Hardware Security Assessment Framework # Sudo python3 /Users/x299/Downloads/chipsec/chipsec_util.py spi info Just tested my mid-2012 13" MBP, same results. Otherwise, it is ignored during normal operation.
If garbage collection failed, VSS2 will be copied to VSS1 during the It gets copied to VSS1 after garbage collection, so whenever it's notĮmpty, it resembles the first part of VSS1. NOTE: VSS2 is the result of the most recent garbage collection operation. THIS VSS WILL PROBABLY BE ERASED DURING NEXT REBOOT.)
VSS2 (INVALID SIGNATURE) (UNKNOWN FORMAT) (GARBAGE COLLECTION INTERRUPTED. Reclaimable dead space (deleted variables): 0 bytes THIS VSS WILL PROBABLY BE ERASED DURING NEXT REBOOT.)įree space appears to be correctly formatted and valid. VSS1 (INVALID SIGNATURE) (UNKNOWN FORMAT) (GARBAGE COLLECTION INTERRUPTED. That is, it continues to log to the same file in use before a warm reset. I also note that logging survives a warm reset. This may explain continued access beyond ExitBootServices. Paid some more attention to MemLogLib and I can see that it is installed as a protocol on the Global Image Handle and that it uses the EDK2 IoLib.
#UEFITOOL IMAGE OR BIOS REGION MINIPRO PROGRAMMER UPDATE#
One possibility is the the MemLogLib used by RP does not make any BootServices->XYZ function calls to update the log (once the basics are done to set it up etc). Typically, the only feedback given by an OS Loader is an ExitBootServices Event raised just before loading the OS Kernel. I suppose an OS Loader might return on ExitbootServices failure (Not Sure). The child image is called indeed, but as an OS Loader, it is a one way call as these never return. Had a quick look and it is definitely nothing to do with being ChildImage. something to look into properly down the line. Perhaps this is because it actually runs OS loaders as child images and that when these call ExitBootServices, the call actually goes to RefindPlus and not to the firmware directly, allowing RefindPlus to shut itself down first and pass this call on to the firmware. Click to expand.You are right though that RefindPlus does not hang as it should on the surface in that circumstance.
0 kommentar(er)
